Tourism’s green turn

Tourism’s green turn

The International Ecotourism Society defines ecotourism as “responsible travel to natural areas that conserve the environment and improve the welfare of local people”. Whatever the definition may be, ecotourism is fast dominating the arena of world tourism. Its aim is to preserve and sustain the diversity of the world’s environments. It is offering countries new opportunities for small-enterprise investment and employment and increases the national stake in protecting their biological resources.

According to the Costa Rica Tourism Board, ICT, approximately 49 per cent of the two million visitors who flew to Costa Rica in 2010 participated in ecotourism activities during their stay. The revenue collected was close to $1 billion. The World Tourism Organis-ation says that ecotourism is the fastest growing market in the tourism industry with an annual growth rate of around five per cent worldwide.

Ravi Sharma, publisher of the Travel Trade Journal (TTJ) says, “Ecotourism accommodates and entertains visitors in a way that is minimally intrusive to the environment and sustains and supports the native cultures in the locations it is operating in. Travel companies and services are all beefing up their eco-credentials in order to attract the rising number of customers seeking a “green” experience. Thus, this type of tourism must be properly managed to protect against adverse environmental effects that can come with the overbuilding of tourist facilities and influx of populations around fragile ecosystems.”

By recognising the importance of protecting biological diversity, eco-tourism is raising the appreciation for biological resources and leading to better conservation practices by local populations.

Both travellers and service providers have a responsibility if ecotourism is to really mean anything. For instance, the Tourism Authority of Thailand (TAT) is promoting green tourism with the country’s tourism operators opening up on the need to answer foreign visitors’ growing ecological concerns. “Travelling green is the only way to preserve the heaven-like reputation of Thailand… I definitely believe that we have to engage local people in this respect. They shall pocket the benefits from an alternative, sustainable type of tourism…,” writes Professor Surachet Chettamart, Dean, Faulty of Tourism, Maha Sarakham University in a TAT book named, Thailand 50 Great Green Escapes.

Back home, the trend is fast catching up and travellers are queuing up for destinations where the flora, fauna and cultural heritage are primary attractions. Though, at present the demand is driven by international travellers, the scenario is changing for better. Says Sunirmal Ghosh of Indo Asia Tours whose project, “Cycling to Coorg” was an entry for the Ministry of Tourism’s annual award for the Most Eco-friendly Project, “Eco-tourism has bright prospects in our country. It is not a new concept in our culture, though we lost track of it completely in the last century. Whether it was about mud houses, gram panchayats or promoting local culture, language, artists and artisans, these activities were nothing new to our civilisation. The positive aspect is that the trend is getting popular and responsible ecotourism aims to minimise the adverse effects of traditional tourism on the natural environment, and enhance the cultural integrity of the local people.”

In addition to evaluating environmental and cultural factors, initiatives by ancillary sectors like hospitality that provide and promote recycling, energy efficiency, water reuse and the creation of economic opportunities for local communities are becoming integral parts of eco-tourism.

Source / Fuente: http://www.deccanchronicle.com

Author / Autor: Rai Umraopati Ray

Date / Fecha: 20/06/11

Visit our Facebook / Visite nuestro Facebook:

www.facebook.com/sustainable.developers

Visit our YouTube channel / Visite nuestro canal de YouTube:

www.youtube.com/user/Canal100SD

WWF lanza unos vinos ecológicos con tapones de corcho

Foto de la Noticia

Foto: EUROPA PRESS

MADRID, 21 Jun. (EUROPA PRESS) –    WWF ha presentado en el Mercado de San Miguel (Madrid) el proyecto de vinos ecológicos con tapones de corcho FSC ‘Un brindis por la Tierra’ para convertir la gestión sostenible del territorio en motor del desarrollo rural y la economía, una iniciativa asentada actualmente en Andalucía, Cataluña, Extremadura, Comunidad Valenciana, Islas Canarias y Castilla-La Mancha.

Según informa la organización, este proyecto financiado por el Ministerio de Medio Ambiente y Medio Rural y Marino (MARM) pretende «servir de referente a empresas de todo el país y contribuir a la integración de estas buenas prácticas en el mercado». A su vez, apunta que cuatro bodegas, 20 viticultores, 15 propietarios de alcornocales y tres industrias de tapones de corcho forman parte actualmente de esta iniciativa.

En este sentido, explica que trabaja de forma coordinada con estos sectores «para darle un valor añadido a sus productos, consiguiendo caldos elaborados con uva ecológica y tapados con corcho FSC», al tiempo que precisa que España produce un 30 por ciento del total del corcho a nivel mundial.

También concreta que «los alcornocales generan ingresos por valor de 1.500 millones de euros al año y que un 70 por ciento de estos ingresos proviene del tapón de corcho». Además, se refiere al hecho de que un 30 por ciento del corcho comercializado está sujeto a políticas de compra responsable y a que España es el segundo país del mundo con mayor superficie de alcornocales.

Asimismo, WWF señala que España cuenta con más de un millón de hectáreas de viñedos, «de las que sólo 55.000 están bajo protección ecológica». Al mismo tiempo, apunta que la certificación de alcornocales por el sello FSC «también necesita un impulso, ya que España, el segundo productor mundial de corcho, cuenta actualmente con 30.469 hectáreas de bosques de alcornoques certificados FSC, de un total de medio millón de hectáreas».

Por su parte, el secretario general de WWF España, Juan Carlos del Olmo, ha defendido el «papel crucial que tiene el mercado para impulsar el éxito de este tipo de iniciativas, que pretenden garantizarle al medio rural un futuro viable». Además, ha destacado «el importante papel de los consumidores», que, a su juicio, «pueden contribuir de manera decisiva al desarrollo sostenible del medio rural».

Finalmente, WWF asegura que empresas como Amorim, Cork Supply, Granorte o Vigas están apostando por el corcho FSC y que ‘Un brindis por la Tierra’ «ya está dando sus frutos y está generando nuevas sinergias sobre el terreno, debido a que se están fraguando dos nuevos procesos de certificación FSC de alcornocales en Extremadura y Cataluña, implicando una extensión casi 13.000 hectáreas».

Source / Fuente: http://www.europapress.es

Author / Autor: Staff

Date / Fecha: 21/06/11

Visit our Facebook / Visite nuestro Facebook:

www.facebook.com/sustainable.developers

Visit our YouTube channel / Visite nuestro canal de YouTube:

www.youtube.com/user/Canal100SD

17.000 paneles solares en la planta de Toyota en Reino Unido.

La planta de Toyota en Derbyshire donde fabrica los Auris HSD, Auris y Avensis, recibirá la aportación eléctrica desde paneles solares suficientes como para producir 7.000 vehículos anuales. La inversión es de 10 millones de libras.

Toyota será el primer fabricante automovilístico del país en instalar una planta solar a gran escala y que permitirá ahorrar 2.000 toneladas de CO2 al año y 4.600.000 kWh equivalente.

De sus dimensiones, nada menos que 90.000 m2, da una idea que es equivalente a 4 campos de fútbol y en ella se instalan unos 17.000 paneles que, además, han sido fabricados íntegramente en el Reino Unido.

El trabajo de instalación ya ha comenzado y se estima finalicen este mes de junio para comenzar a opera el mes próximo. La del Reino Unido es una de las cinco que Toyota tiene en todo el mundo diseñadas como «sostenibles» con la mejor de las credenciales medioambientales.

Tony Walker, director general adjunto de la fábrica, dijo: «Ya estamos haciendo una contribución significativa a las bajas emisiones de carbono en el Reino Unido con la producción del Auris híbrido -el primer coche híbrido completo fabricado en Europa-. La generación de energía solar en el sitio para el suministro de electricidad a la planta subraya nuestro compromiso de hacer aún más para reducir las emisiones de carbono y es otro ejemplo de nuestro liderazgo ambiental. Estamos encantados de trabajar en asociación con British Gas para lograrlo.»

Jon Kimber, director general de British Gas New Energy, dijo: «Con los costos de energía cada vez mayor y un clima financiero difícil, todas las empresas están buscando formas de reducir sus facturas, así como reducir sus emisiones de carbono. La energía solar tiene el potencial para que esto suceda y realmente revolucionar la forma de generación de energía en hogares y empresas de Gran Bretaña. Toyota es un verdadero referente para los negocios verdes en todo el Reino Unido.»

Recordar que Toyota fue el primer fabricante de automóviles del Reino Unido en obtener la norma internacional ISO 14001 para la gestión medioambiental en el año 1996, y el primero en reducir la cantidad de residuos a vertedero a cero en 2002. Y en 2008 culminó con cero residuos de incineración. Un liderazgo constatado.

Source / Fuente: motorcanario.com

Author / Autor: Staff

Date / Fecha: 14/06/11

Visit our Facebook / Visite nuestro Facebook:

www.facebook.com/sustainable.developers

Visit our YouTube channel / Visite nuestro canal de YouTube:

www.youtube.com/user/Canal100SD

New Jersey to close round one of bids for offshore wind

This offshore wind project could be first in the nation to start running. The U.S. has lagged behind Europe and other countries in getting offshore wind to market.

Wind turbines

Wind turbines stand in the Baltic 1 offshore wind farm on April 29, 2011
in the Baltic Sea near Zingst, Germany. (Joern Pollex/Getty Images)

STEVE CHIOTAKIS: New Jersey today wraps up the first round of applications on its new offshore wind project. The Garden State could be the first in the country to actually start harnessing offshore wind for power.

Marketplace’s Eve Troeh reports from the Sustainability Desk, the U.S. lags behind Europe and other countries in getting offshore wind to market.


EVE TROEH: America’s windiest land is also no man’s land. Wind farms in the plains and deserts need long transmission lines to get power to the people.

Andy Wickless is with Navigant Consulting. He says East Coast waters are the best bet for wind power because of all the big cities nearby.

ANDY WICKLESS: Which can be a plus and a minus. A plus in terms of the amount of transmission you have to build. A minus in terms of potential public backlash.

Backlash has held up one offshore proposal called Cape Wind for about a decade. Its developers want to put turbines in Nantucket Sound.

CAPE WIND: THE FIGHT FOR THE FUTURE OF POWER IN AMERICA CLIP: Greenpeace, these are the fishermen that you’re trying to put out of business.

That’s from a documentary about the fight. It’s clean energy activists versus vacationers and local business.

But public opinion’s just the beginning. It’s taken government agencies a long time to write offshore wind guidelines. And once wind developers do get permits, Andy Wickless says they still need other companies to build transmission lines and utilities to promise to buy the power.

WICKLESS: If fewer folks were involved, it’d probably go faster.

And motivation helps, too. New Jersey has it, because offshore wind means work, mostly at ports. The huge blades and poles need to be assembled near the water.

Jim Lenard is president of the Offshore Wind Development Coalition. He says New Jersey’s willing to trade the higher price of wind power for jobs.

JIM LENARD: The developers have to show that the benefits that they’re bringing to the state of New Jersey exceed the costs that the ratepayers might be asked to pay.

The first offshore turbines should start spinning next September — just six of them — in state waters near Atlantic City. New Jersey’s enthusiasm for wind may seem at odds with another move; it just quit a program to trade greenhouse gases.

But Jim Lenard says right now, climate change isn’t the way to sell wind power to lawmakers.

LENARD: We recognize that their interests lie more with economic development, job creation and manufacturing.

He says that new script should help offshore wind pick up speed.

I’m Eve Troeh for Marketplace.

Source / Fuente: marketplace.publicradio.org

Author / Autor: Eve Troeh

Date / Fecha: 14/06/11

Visit our Facebook / Visite nuestro Facebook:

www.facebook.com/sustainable.developers

Visit our YouTube channel / Visite nuestro canal de YouTube:

www.youtube.com/user/Canal100SD

Las «zonas muertas» sin oxígeno se extienden en los océanos

La vida en los océanos está en «riesgo de extinción inminente» como consecuencia del cambio climático y la sobrepesca, según se desprende del estudio elaborado por el Programa Internacional sobre el Estados de los Océanos (IPSO), que señala que los mares están en la peor situación desde los inicios de la Tierra.

Así, según los expertos, el tiempo «se está acabando» para hacer frente a los peligros que acechan la vida en los océanos y, en especial, al descenso del nivel de oxígeno en el agua, que forman las «zonas muertas», en las que no puede desarrollarse la vida. Los océanos «se enfrentan a perder las especies marinas y sus ecosistemas enteros, en una sola generación», destaca el documento.

De hecho, los científicos apuntan que podría tratarse de la mayor masa de extinción en millones de años y la comparan con la desaparición de los dinosaurios.

Además, el estudio, que será presentado ante las Naciones Unidas, apunta que la desaparición de la vida marina traería graves consecuencias  al planeta, ya que «los peces son la principal fuente de proteínas para una quinta parte de la población mundial y los mares absorben el oxígeno y ayudan a la reducción de emisiones de dióxido de carbono procedentes de actividades humanas».

Ante esta situación, los especialistas han apuntado que los Gobiernos deben tomar parte y dar mayor importancia a las políticas medio ambientales. En este caso, proponen una regulación más restrictiva de la pesca, además de medidas para reducir las emisiones de gas de efecto invernadero.

Source / Fuente: http://www.ecoticias.com

Author / Autor: Ecoticias

Date / Fecha: 21/06/11

Visit our Facebook / Visite nuestro Facebook:

www.facebook.com/sustainable.developers

Visit our YouTube channel / Visite nuestro canal de YouTube:

www.youtube.com/user/Canal100SD

Chemicals Were Injected Into Wells, Report Says

Matt Nager for The New York Times
A sign warns against swimming in a holding lake in Texas, where Fountain Quail Water 
Management separates and cleans hydrofracking water.
WASHINGTON — Oil and gas companies injected hundreds of millions of gallons of hazardous or carcinogenic chemicals into wells in more than 13 states from 2005 to 2009, according to an investigation by Congressional Democrats.
The chemicals were used by companies during a drilling process known as hydraulic fracturing, or hydrofracking, which involves the high-pressure injection of a mixture of water, sand and chemical additives into rock formations deep underground. The process, which is being used to tap into large reserves ofnatural gas around the country, opens fissures in the rock to stimulate the release of oil and gas.

Hydrofracking has attracted increased scrutiny from lawmakers and environmentalists in part because of fears that the chemicals used during the process can contaminate underground sources of drinking water.

“Questions about the safety of hydraulic fracturing persist, which are compounded by the secrecy surrounding the chemicals used in hydraulic fracturing fluids,” said the report, which was written by Representatives Henry A. Waxman of California, Edward J. Markey of Massachusetts and Diana DeGette of Colorado.

The report, released late Saturday, also faulted companies for at times “injecting fluids containing chemicals that they themselves cannot identify.”

The inquiry over hydrofracking, which was initiated by the House Energy and Commerce Committee when Mr. Waxman led it last year, also found that 14 of the nation’s most active hydraulic fracturing companies used 866 million gallons of hydraulic fracturing products — not including water. More than 650 of these products contained chemicals that are known or possible human carcinogens, regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act, or are listed as hazardous air pollutants, the report said.

A request for comment from the American Petroleum Institute about the report received no reply.

Matt Armstrong, an energy attorney from Bracewell & Giuliani that represents several companies involved in natural gas drilling, faulted the methodology of the congressional report released Saturday and an earlier report by the same lawmakers.

«This report uses the same sleight of hand deployed in the last report on diesel use — it compiles overall product volumes, not the volumes of the hazardous chemicals contained within those products,» he said. «This generates big numbers but provides no context for the use of these chemicals over the many thousands of frac jobs that were conducted within the timeframe of the report.»

Some ingredients mixed into the hydraulic fracturing fluids were common and generally harmless, like salt and citric acid. Others were unexpected, like instant coffee and walnut hulls, the report said. Many ingredients were “extremely toxic,” including benzene, a known human carcinogen, and lead.

Companies injected large amounts of other hazardous chemicals, including 11.4 million gallons of fluids containing at least one of the toxic or carcinogenic B.T.E.X. chemicals — benzene, toluene, xylene and ethylbenzene. The companies used the highest volume of fluids containing one or more carcinogens in Colorado, Oklahoma and Texas.

The report comes two and a half months after an initial report by the same three lawmakers that found that 32.2 millions of gallons of fluids containing diesel, considered an especially hazardous pollutant because it contains benzene, were injected into the ground during hydrofracking by a dozen companies from 2005 to 2009, in possible violation of the drinking water act.

A 2010 report by Environmental Working Group, a research and advocacy organization, found that benzene levels in other hydrofracking ingredients were as much as 93 times higher than those found in diesel.

The use of these chemicals has been a source of concern to regulators and environmentalists who worry that some of them could find their way out of a well bore — because of above-ground spills, underground failures of well casing or migration through layers of rock — and into nearby sources of drinking water.

These contaminants also remain in the fluid that returns to the surface after a well is hydrofracked. A recent investigation by The New York Times found high levels of contaminants, including benzene and radioactive materials, in wastewater that is being sent to treatment plants not designed to fully treat the waste before it is discharged into rivers. At one plant in Pennsylvania, documents from the Environmental Protection Agency revealed levels of benzene roughly 28 times the federal drinking water standard in wastewater as it was discharged, after treatment, into the Allegheny River in May 2008.

The E.P.A. is conducting a national study on the drinking water risks associated with hydrofracking, but assessing these risks has been made more difficult by companies’ unwillingness to publicly disclose which chemicals and in what concentrations they are used, according to internal e-mails and draft notes of the study plan.

Some companies are moving toward more disclosure, and the industry will soon start a public database of these chemicals. But the Congressional report said that reporting to this database is strictly voluntary, that disclosure will not include the chemical identity of products labeled as proprietary, and that there is no way to determine if companies are accurately reporting information for all wells. In Pennsylvania, the lack of disclosure of drilling ingredients has also incited a heated debate among E.P.A. lawyers about the threat and legality of treatment plants accepting the wastewater and discharging it into rivers.

Source / Fuente: http://www.nytimes.com

Author / Autor: Ian Urbina

Date / Fecha: 16/06/11

Visit our Facebook / Visite nuestro Facebook:

www.facebook.com/sustainable.developers

Visit our YouTube channel / Visite nuestro canal de YouTube:

www.youtube.com/user/Canal100SD